Profit splits are advertised per firm and paid per product. A firm promoting 90% commonly reaches it on one plan while its remaining plans pay less, and scaling-plan ceilings are quoted as though they were starting rates. Every figure below is the split the individual product publishes.
Disclosure: We earn a commission if you sign up via links on this page — at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.
Which products actually qualify
Of 19 firms with current product data, 4 pay 90% or more on every captured product; 4 have at least one outright qualifying product and at least one product with a different or unpublished verdict. Across 89 captured products, 21 qualify, 0 are conditional, 58 do not qualify, 10 have no published answer we could verify.
Firms sell several challenge products and their rules diverge between them. Every verdict below is read from that product's own captured terms, not from a single firm-wide setting.
Qualifies on some products only — check before you buy
Product terms last captured Aug 10, 2026. Products older than 30 days are dropped until recaptured, so a missing product means stale data rather than a discontinued plan. Every source is linked beside its product; use the challenge comparison to compare price, risk and payout terms.
Ranked qualifying firms
Full product coverage ranks before partial coverage; editorial score decides the order within each coverage group.
The factors below are what we weight when ranking firms on this list.
The split sets your break-even
Your fee returns at fee divided by split. A $500 challenge on a 90% split needs $556 of profit to repay itself; the same fee at 70% needs $714. Every reset repeats the gap.
A ceiling is not a starting rate
Scaling plans advertise the maximum reachable after milestones. What you are paid on your first withdrawal is the product rate at purchase, which is what this page records.
A high split is often funded by a harder rule
Products at the top of a firm's split range frequently carry tighter drawdown or a consistency cap. Read the split beside the risk rules rather than on its own.
Frequently asked questions
Is a higher profit split always better?
No. The split applies only to profit you are permitted to keep and withdraw. A 95% product with trailing drawdown and a tight consistency cap can pay less in practice than an 80% product with static drawdown and no cap. Compare the split against the rule set that governs it.
Why does this page disagree with a firm's advertised split?
We record what each product publishes rather than the firm's best case. Where a firm's own pages conflict with each other we mark the figure unverified instead of selecting the higher number, and note the conflict on our change watch.
Do any firms pay a 100% split?
Some publish a 100% rate on specific products or as a scaling ceiling. Where a product publishes it we record it. Where it is only reachable after milestones, the milestone terms — not the headline — decide what you are actually paid.