Disclosure: We earn a commission if you sign up via links on this page — at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.
Verdict
City Traders Imperium is the right pick for swing and position traders who need an unlimited-time evaluation environment and a long-horizon funded account structure.
- UK-based prop firm operating since 2018 — one of the older firms in our covered set.
- 2-Step Challenge model with no time limit on the evaluation phase.
- 70% starting profit split — lower than market headline but with scaling to higher tiers.
- $2M maximum allocation via scaling.
- Static drawdown — forgiving mechanic.
- Monthly payout cadence.
- Platforms: MT5 and cTrader.
- Positioned for traders with longer time horizons rather than scalpers or news traders.
Quick facts
| Founded | 2018 (8 years operating) |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom |
| Evaluation model | 2-Step Challenge, no time limit |
| Max allocation | $2,000,000 |
| Profit split | 70% standard, scaling up |
| Drawdown type | Static |
| Payouts | Monthly |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader |
| Instruments | Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Challenges available
Single 2-Step Challenge across standard account sizes ($5K through $200K, with stacking up to the $2M ceiling). No time limit on the evaluation phase — a structural advantage for swing and position traders who need weeks or months to demonstrate their edge. Per-tier pricing and exact rule parameters require verification on the live CTI site. Data captured 2026-05-20.
The challenge fee follows the industry-standard refundable-on-first-payout structure.
How the rules actually work
No time limit on evaluation is CTI's signature feature. Most CFD prop firms cap evaluation phases at 30 days or impose a "minimum trading days within X period" rule. CTI removes both — a swing trader who needs 3 months to hit 10% profit can do that without rule pressure.
Static drawdown — 10% max loss anchored at starting balance.
EA / algorithmic trading allowed on MT5 and cTrader.
Overnight holding allowed; weekend holding not consistently documented in accessible sources.
News trading rules not fully published — treat as restricted on evaluation, allowed on funded, until verified.
Scaling plan brings the profit split from 70% starting toward higher tiers (industry-typical paths reach 80–90% on the longest-tenured accounts).
True cost to break even
| Tier | Fee (estimate) | Break-even (70%) | R-multiple vs 10% DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25K | ~$180 | $257 | 0.10 |
| $50K | ~$280 | $400 | 0.08 |
| $100K | ~$480 | $686 | 0.07 |
The 70% split is the structural cost. Break-even profits at CTI are 12–25% higher than at an 80% split competitor for the same fee. The trade-off is the no-time-limit evaluation — swing traders who would otherwise pay multiple FTMO retries because the 30-day evaluation window is too tight may find CTI's all-in cost lower.
Payout speed in practice
CTI runs monthly payouts with bank wire and crypto methods. The slower cadence vs bi-weekly competitors is consistent with the firm's long-horizon trader positioning — monthly cycles pair naturally with swing/position trading.
Community signal: Trustpilot reviews are present from CTI's 8-year operating history with a 4.5/5 cluster. Payout reliability through multiple market cycles is the meaningful credibility signal.
Pros
- No time limit on evaluation — uncommon among CFD props. FTMO and FundedNext both removed time limits in 2023–24 but most other firms still enforce 30-day caps.
- 8-year operating history — third-longest in our covered set (after Topstep and FTMO).
- $2M max allocation — matches FTMO.
- Static drawdown — forgiving mechanic.
- cTrader and MT5 both supported.
- UK-based operating entity.
Cons
- 70% starting split is the lowest headline rate in our covered set. Scaling helps but the entry economics are unfavorable.
- Monthly payouts — slower than the bi-weekly industry standard.
- No MT4 or DXTrade.
- Pricing not on stable public URLs — verification requires the live site.
- Lower review volume on Trustpilot than the giants — operating history is long but community footprint is moderate.
- Single product line — no Instant or 1-Step variants.
Who should pick City Traders Imperium
A swing or position trader whose strategy needs weeks-to-months of evaluation time to demonstrate. The no-time-limit feature is structurally unique. Pair with a system that doesn't need fast payouts (monthly cadence works) and an 8-year operating history matters more to you than a higher headline split.
Who should avoid City Traders Imperium
A scalper or day trader — the 70% starting split punishes high-frequency strategies. FundedNext at 95% or FundingPips at scaling to 100% are structurally better. A trader needing fast payouts — CTI's monthly cycle is the slowest in our covered set.
FAQ
Is City Traders Imperium legit in 2026?
Yes — operating since 2018 (8 years), processes monthly payouts on the funded side. Trustpilot ratings sit around 4.5/5. The 8-year track record is meaningful credibility — only Topstep (14 years) and FTMO (11 years) have longer operating histories in our covered set.
Why is CTI's profit split lower than competitors?
CTI prices itself as a long-horizon firm rather than a high-frequency one. The 70% starting split is the structural cost of the no-time-limit feature — swing and position traders who would otherwise pay for multiple FTMO/FundedNext retries because the 30-day evaluation is too tight may find CTI's all-in cost lower, even with the lower per-payout split.
What's the no-time-limit feature actually worth?
For swing traders running positions over weeks or months, it's structural. For day traders or scalpers who naturally trade every day, it has no value — the 30-day cap at other firms doesn't constrain you. The feature pays off only for strategies whose natural cadence is longer than 30 days.
Can US residents use City Traders Imperium?
No. Like most CFD prop firms, CTI doesn't accept US residents due to CFTC restrictions.
How high does the split scale?
CTI's published scaling milestones aren't fully documented in accessible sources, but industry-typical paths reach 80% or higher after sustained funded performance. Verify exact tier thresholds on the firm's live site.