Every prop firm challenge follows the same five-stage lifecycle. The numbers and rules differ — but the structure is the same across FTMO, FundedNext, FXIFY, Topstep, and every other firm worth considering. This page walks the lifecycle end-to-end with live 2026 numbers, so you can evaluate any challenge against the same mental model.
- Buy the challenge — pay a refundable fee, pick an account size, accept the rules.
- Phase 1 evaluation — hit a profit target (typically 8–10%) without breaching daily or max drawdown.
- Phase 2 verification — repeat at a lower target (typically 5%), proving consistency.
- Funded account — trade real-economic-impact account, get paid your share of profits.
- First payout + scaling — claim the fee refund, take your share, unlock higher tiers.
1-step challenges fold stages 2 and 3 into one. Instant funding skips evaluation entirely (stages 2 and 3) and goes straight to a funded account. Every variant is a permutation of the same five stages.
Stage 1 — Buying the challenge
You pick a firm, an account size, and a challenge type, then pay a one-time fee. The fee is refundable with your first payout on standard evaluation products — you get it back when you start being paid. On instant funding products (FundedNext Stellar Instant, FXIFY Instant, OFP Funding), the fee is typically not refundable.
What the firm asks of you upfront:
- Email + basic identity. KYC (full identity verification with passport / ID upload) is usually deferred until you reach payout, not at signup.
- Choice of trading platform — typically MT4, MT5, cTrader, or DXTrade. Once chosen on most firms it can be changed for new attempts but not mid-challenge.
- Choice of standard vs swing account (FTMO specifically) — swing variants allow overnight and weekend holding but at different leverage tiers.
Real 2026 examples from our verified data (FTMO, FundedNext, FXIFY):
| Firm | Product | $100K fee (USD) | Refundable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| FundedNext | Stellar 2-Step | $549.99 | Yes, on first payout |
| FXIFY | One-Phase (with NEW40) | ~$330 (40% off) | Yes |
| FundedNext | Stellar Instant ($10K) | $299.99 | No |
Stage 2 — Phase 1 evaluation
You trade with a simulated account loaded with the notional balance you bought (e.g. $100,000). The firm watches three things: did you hit the profit target, did you blow the daily drawdown, did you blow the max drawdown.
Profit target: typically 8–10% on Phase 1. On FundedNext Stellar 2-Step at $100K, that's $8,000 of net trading profit. There's no time limit on most modern challenges — FTMO removed its 30-day cap in 2023, FundedNext followed in 2024. FXIFY's Lightning is the exception with a hard 7-day window.
Daily drawdown: typically 5% of starting balance, anchored to the equity at server-day start (usually UTC midnight). On a $100K account that's a $5,000 intraday loss line. A profitable morning does not extend your afternoon allowance — the cap is fixed at server-day open, regardless of your floating high.
Maximum drawdown: typically 10%. Two flavors:
- Static (FTMO, FundedNext, FundingPips, E8 Markets, OFP): the loss line is fixed at the starting balance — $90,000 on a $100K account, period. It does not move as you profit. This is the forgiving variant.
- Trailing (FXIFY, Topstep, My Funded Futures): the loss line follows your equity high. If your equity peaks at $103,000, your max-loss line moves up to $92,700 and locks once you reach the funded stage. This is the punishing variant — profit retention discipline matters.
Hit any one of those three (miss the target, breach daily, breach max), and the account ends. Most firms then offer a discounted "reset" fee — typically $50–$200 — to try again.
Stage 3 — Phase 2 verification
Standard 2-step challenges (FTMO, FundedNext Stellar 2-Step, FXIFY Two-Phase, most major firms) require a verification phase before funding. The structure is the same as Phase 1 with one change: the profit target drops — typically from 8–10% down to 4–5%.
The lower target is intentional. Phase 1 proves you can hit a target. Phase 2 proves you can do it again without taking outsized risk. The firms aren't testing whether you can scalp 10% in a day — they're testing whether you can stay disciplined after a successful Phase 1.
The drawdown rules from Phase 1 carry forward unchanged. Many traders breach Phase 2 after passing Phase 1 because the lower target creates over-confidence and oversized positions.
1-step challenges (FTMO 1-Step, FundedNext Stellar 1-Step, FXIFY One-Phase) fold this stage into Stage 2 — you hit a single target (typically 10%) and skip verification. Single-phase products are faster to pass for a confident trader but less forgiving — a single mistake costs the whole evaluation.
Stage 4 — The funded account
You pass the evaluation phases. The firm activates a funded account — usually still simulated trading, but with payouts tied to real PnL. Key things change at this stage:
- Profit target requirement disappears. You're now just trading; the firm wants you to be consistently profitable, not to hit a specific number per period.
- Drawdown rules continue to apply. If you breach daily or max drawdown on the funded account, the account ends and you lose the funded relationship. Some firms (FTMO, FundedNext) let you re-purchase the challenge at a discount; others don't.
- Restrictions tighten on a few firms. FTMO restricts news trading on the funded "Rewards" account (it was allowed during evaluation). Other firms (FundedNext, FXIFY) keep rules consistent across stages.
- The profit split applies. Standard rates: 80% (FTMO base, E8, Alpha Capital, Maven, Bright Funded, CFT, CTI), 90% (Topstep, MFF, FTMO scaled, TFT, OFP), 95% (FundedNext Stellar 2-Step/1-Step), up to 100% (FundingPips scaled, FXIFY Futures).
Stage 5 — First payout and scaling
This is where the "refundable challenge fee" promise turns into actual money. You request a payout from the funded account. The firm verifies your KYC (now required), processes the payout, and returns your challenge fee with your first paid payout on refundable products.
Time to first payout:
| Firm | First payout available | After that, cadence |
|---|---|---|
| FTMO | 30 days after activation | Bi-weekly |
| FundedNext Stellar 2-Step | ~7–14 days, then on-demand | On-demand |
| FXIFY evaluation products | Day 1 ($50 minimum) | On-demand |
| Topstep XFA | After minimum winning days | On-demand via AeroPay (<9s) |
| FundingPips | ~14 days post 5 trading days | Bi-weekly |
Payment methods: Bank wire (universal, slowest, sometimes pass-through fees), crypto USDT (typically TRC-20, fastest internationally, firm covers network fee), Rise / B2B remittance (for traders outside US/EU), ACH (US-domestic only, for Topstep / MFF).
Scaling: after sustained funded performance, most firms increase the account size and / or the profit split. FTMO's Scaling Plan: 4 calendar months on the same Rewards Account with ≥10% average net profit and at least 2 payouts taken triggers a 25% account-size increase and the split moves from 80% to 90%. The plan repeats until the account reaches $2M. FundingPips has a similar progression that takes the split from 80% to 100%. Topstep and MFF scale by promoting from XFA to Live Funded with up to $250K in performance bonuses, but only 0.71% of XFA traders reach Live (Topstep's published 2025 figure).
Three worked walkthroughs
A. 2-step path on FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
- Pay $549.99. Pick MT5, standard account.
- Phase 1: hit $8,000 profit (8%). Stay above $90,000 max-loss line and respect the $5,000 daily cap. No time limit.
- Phase 2: hit $5,000 profit (5%). Same drawdown rules.
- Funded account activates. 95% profit split. Continue trading. Drawdown rules persist.
- First payout ~7–14 days in. KYC verification. Request payout (e.g., $1,500 in profit). FundedNext takes 5% = $75; you receive $1,425. Plus the $549.99 fee refund. Total to your account: $1,974.99. Subsequent payouts on-demand without the fee-refund line.
B. 1-step path on FXIFY Lightning $5K
- Pay $59. Pick MT5.
- Lightning: hit $250 profit (5%) within 7 calendar days. Stay above the trailing 10% max-loss line. Respect 4% daily cap ($200).
- Funded account activates. 80% profit split (with add-ons can be higher). On-demand payouts from day 1.
- First payout as soon as you have $50+ profit. FXIFY's 80% means a $100 net profit pays you $80. Fee refund applies on the first payout. Total recovered against the $59 fee: positive after a single $100 profitable trade.
C. Instant path on FundedNext Stellar Instant $10K
- Pay $299.99. Pick MT5. Fee is not refundable.
- Skip evaluation entirely. You're funded immediately on a simulated $10K account.
- Trade with 6% trailing max-loss (much tighter than evaluation products). 70% profit split. No daily cap published, but the tight trailing rule is the real risk.
- Request a payout once you've hit a 5% gain ($500 in profit). Receive $500 × 70% = $350. Net of the non-refundable $299.99 fee, your real-money outcome is $50 — i.e. you need to take a payout before the fee + tight DD math turns against you. Instant funding is the most expensive path; it's only worth it for traders with a proven edge who would otherwise pay multiple evaluation attempts.
The single biggest rule that ends accounts
Trailing maximum drawdown on futures and instant products. More funded accounts close because of trailing-DD math after a profitable run than because traders couldn't hit profit targets in the first place. If you can't articulate exactly where your drawdown floor sits after a $X profitable day, do not put real money on a trailing-DD product. Static drawdown firms (FTMO, FundedNext Stellar 2-Step, FundingPips) are structurally easier to manage and worth the slightly lower headline split for most traders.
Want to compare specific firms?
Every claim on this page is sourced to our verified challenge data. See the per-firm reviews for the full details:
- FTMO — the longest operating history, static DD
- FundedNext — 95% split flagship, multiple product variants
- FXIFY — six challenge products including Lightning and Instant
- Topstep — the futures pioneer with published pass-rate stats
- FundingPips — 100% scaling ceiling, cheapest at entry
Or jump to the full directory or read the true-cost economics if you want the math behind which challenge is structurally cheapest to break even on.