My Funded Futures vs Tradeify (2026): 5 vs 4 Products
Compare 9 current products across 6 first-party source pages — funded cost, split, drawdown and payout rules without flattening one product into a firm-wide answer.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you sign up via eligible links on this page, at no cost to you. Partnerships never change our scores; partner placements are labelled. How we make money.
Available product sources · earliest check Oct 20, 2026
We track 5 My Funded Futures products and 4 from Tradeify that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-10-20 to 2026-10-22. Tradeify is cheaper to funded at 4 of the 4 directly comparable tiers. At $25K, the cheapest verified route is Growth Evaluation at $99 (One-time fee), which needs $110 of profit at a 90% split before the fee is back in your pocket.
Product-level: My Funded Futures vs Tradeify
Compare the 9 source-checked products available here, each with its own fees, split, drawdown and date.
We track 5 My Funded Futures products and 4 from Tradeify that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-10-20 to 2026-10-22.
Tradeify is cheaper to funded at 4 of the 4 directly comparable tiers. At $25K, the cheapest verified route is Growth Evaluation at $99 (One-time fee), which needs $110 of profit at a 90% split before the fee is back in your pocket.
Tradeify's own products disagree on 10 terms. On evaluation steps it is 1-step on Growth Evaluation and Select Evaluation → Flex and Select Evaluation → Daily, versus instant funding on Lightning Funded. Which product you buy decides that rule, not which firm you sign with — a firm-level table cannot show this.
Cost to funded, matched by account size
Not in the cost tables: My Funded Futures Flex. The latest capture records no complete entry price for it, so it is not ranked on cost.
$25K account
Tradeify is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Growth Evaluation at $99 — $6 less than My Funded Futures' cheapest route at this tier (Builder, $105) — 6% cheaper.
Cost to a funded $25K account, every verified product on both sides
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
$50K account
Tradeify is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Growth Evaluation at $145 — $8 less than My Funded Futures' cheapest route at this tier (Builder, $153) — 5% cheaper.
Cost to a funded $50K account, every verified product on both sides
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
$100K account
Tradeify is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Growth Evaluation at $255 — $101 less than My Funded Futures' cheapest route at this tier (Rapid, $356) — 28% cheaper.
Cost to a funded $100K account, every verified product on both sides
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
$150K account
Tradeify is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Growth Evaluation at $369 — $94 less than My Funded Futures' cheapest route at this tier (Rapid, $463) — 20% cheaper.
Cost to a funded $150K account, every verified product on both sides
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
Rule-by-rule, product by product
Each cell shows every value that firm's current products hold. Where a firm disagrees with itself the products are named — those are the rows a firm-level table has to flatten, and the ones that decide whether your strategy is allowed. 10 of 16 rows split this way in this matchup.
Product-level rule comparison, My Funded Futures vs Tradeify
MFFU moved new purchases to one-time plans and added Rapid EOD
Do not compare the old monthly subscription figures with a new MFFU checkout. Russia is on MFFU's restricted-country list and cannot purchase a new account. For current buyers, verify the selected size, one-time total, plan variant, payout buffer and any promotion in checkout; legacy subscriptions bought before the migration follow their original billing terms.
TradeifyOpen watch
Tradeify list prices and homepage promotions can diverge
The comparison stores stable base purchase prices, not a temporary coupon, reset fee or purchase-date payout cap. Confirm the final discount, reset cost, account purchase date and applicable payout table in checkout and the account agreement.
Sources (6 first-party pages, latest capture Oct 22, 2026)
Every figure above is read from these pages. Products older than 30 days are removed from the comparison until they are recaptured, so a missing product means stale data, not a discontinued plan.
Firm-level context
These directory fields describe the firms, not a universal product rule. The sourced product tables above decide the exact fee, split, drawdown and trading conditions. Directory context is not independently refreshed by this comparison; verify platform and payment availability for the exact programme and country.