Traders Fund Hub
CompareRU
Traders Fund Hub

Compare 18 prop firms on fees, rules and payouts, with a date on every source.

Editorially independent: partnerships never change scores or order.

Latest product capture Oct 14, 2026·80 priced programmes

Compare

  • Best Prop Firms 2026
  • Firm directory
  • Compare challenges
  • Rule changes
  • Cheapest firms
  • Discount codes
  • How challenges work

By country & style

  • UK
  • US
  • India
  • India: challenge comparison
  • India: firm matchups
  • India: rule changes
  • Futures
  • Crypto
  • Swing trading

Reviews

  • FTMO
  • FundedNext
  • FundingPips
  • E8 Markets
  • Alpha Capital
  • All reviews & guides

Company

  • About us
  • How we score firms
  • Authors
  • Contact

Trading involves significant risk of loss. Information only, not financial advice. Some links are affiliate links. Full disclaimers →

© 2026 Traders Fund Hub. All rights reserved.

  • Русская версия
  • Methodology
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimers
All comparisons
Product evidence · 7 products · 6 source pages

FundingPips vs Topstep (2026): 5 vs 2 Products

Compare 7 current products across 6 first-party source pages — funded cost, split, drawdown and payout rules without flattening one product into a firm-wide answer.

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you sign up via eligible links on this page, at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.

FundingPips

TFH 8.7/10
  • Products5 fresh
  • Starting splits80–95%
  • DrawdownsStatic / Trailing
Visit FundingPips Read full review
vs

Topstep

TFH 8.5/10
  • Products2 fresh
  • Starting splits90%
  • DrawdownsEOD trailing
Visit Topstep Read full review

Evidence summary

Available product sources · earliest check Sep 29, 2026

We track 5 FundingPips products and 2 from Topstep that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-06. These firms sell different instruments — FundingPips runs CFD products and Topstep runs futures — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race. FundingPips offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Product-level: FundingPips vs Topstep

Compare the 7 source-checked products available here, each with its own fees, split, drawdown and date.

We track 5 FundingPips products and 2 from Topstep that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-06. These firms sell different instruments — FundingPips runs CFD products and Topstep runs futures — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race.

FundingPips offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

FundingPips's own products disagree on 12 terms. On evaluation steps it is 2-step on 2 Step Flex and 2 Step Pro and 2 Step Standard, versus 1-step on 1 Step Flex, versus instant funding on FundingPips Zero. Which product you buy decides that rule, not which firm you sign with — a firm-level table cannot show this.

Cost to funded, matched by account size

$50K account

FundingPips offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Cost to a funded $50K account, every verified product on both sides
ProductCost to fundedBreak-even profitR-multipleDays @ 1%/day
Trading Combine - No Activation Fee PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$951 month, no activation fee$106at 90% split0.05vs $2,000 tier max loss—
Trading Combine - Standard PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$1981 month + $149 activation$220at 90% split0.11vs $2,000 tier max loss—
2 Step ProFundingPips · One-time · 80% split$224One-time fee$280at 80% split0.09vs 6% max DD1
FundingPips ZeroFundingPips · One-time · 95% split$244One-time fee$257at 95% split0.10vs 5% trailing max DD1
1 Step FlexFundingPips · One-time · 80% split$322One-time fee$403at 80% split0.07vs 12% max DD1

R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.

$100K account

FundingPips offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Cost to a funded $100K account, every verified product on both sides
ProductCost to fundedBreak-even profitR-multipleDays @ 1%/day
Trading Combine - No Activation Fee PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$1491 month, no activation fee$166at 90% split0.06vs $3,000 tier max loss—
Trading Combine - Standard PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$2481 month + $149 activation$276at 90% split0.09vs $3,000 tier max loss—
2 Step ProFundingPips · One-time · 80% split$422One-time fee$528at 80% split0.09vs 6% max DD1
FundingPips ZeroFundingPips · One-time · 95% split$444One-time fee$467at 95% split0.09vs 5% trailing max DD1
1 Step FlexFundingPips · One-time · 80% split$566One-time fee$708at 80% split0.06vs 12% max DD1

R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.

Rule-by-rule, product by product

Each cell shows every value that firm's current products hold. Where a firm disagrees with itself the products are named — those are the rows a firm-level table has to flatten, and the ones that decide whether your strategy is allowed. 12 of 16 rows split this way in this matchup.

Product-level rule comparison, FundingPips vs Topstep
TermFundingPipsTopstep
Evaluation steps
2-step2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, 2 Step Standard
1-step1 Step Flex
Instant fundingFundingPips Zero
1-step
Profit split
80%1 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro
Not published2 Step Flex, 2 Step Standard
95%FundingPips Zero
90%
Drawdown method
Static1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, 2 Step Standard
TrailingFundingPips Zero
EOD trailing
Daily loss cap
3%1 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, FundingPips Zero
4%2 Step Flex
5%2 Step Standard
Not published
Max loss cap
12%1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex
10%2 Step Standard
5%FundingPips Zero
6%2 Step Pro
Fixed $ per tier
Funded drawdown
Static1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, 2 Step Standard
TrailingFundingPips Zero
EOD trailing
Min trading days
01 Step Flex
12 Step Flex
22 Step Pro
32 Step Standard
UnverifiedFundingPips Zero
Unverified
Max trading dayssame
Unverified
Unverified
Consistency rule
Unverified1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro
15%FundingPips Zero
35%2 Step Standard
55%
First payout after
14 days1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, FundingPips Zero
7 days2 Step Pro
Not published2 Step Standard
Not published
Payout frequency
Bi-weekly1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, FundingPips Zero
Not published2 Step Standard
Weekly2 Step Pro
On demand
News trading
Conditional1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, 2 Step Standard
Not allowedFundingPips Zero
Conditional
Weekend holding
Conditional1 Step Flex, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro, 2 Step Standard
Not allowedFundingPips Zero
Not allowed
Overnight holding
Allowed
Not allowed
EAs / algossame
Conditional
Conditional
Copy tradingsame
Conditional
Conditional

Dated changes affecting these firms

TopstepVerified

Topstep now publishes a 55% Combine consistency target

Use 55% for the Combine objective. The separate XFA Consistency payout route remains 40% with three trading days. October 6 is our observation date, not an established effective date; minimum-day descriptions still conflict.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
TopstepVerified

Correction: Topstep payout eligibility is not a three-calendar-day transfer

TFH removed the single calendar-day payout figure, corrected the No Activation Fee path's blanket automation permissions and added the published dollar loss limits per tier. Fee-recovery tables now use those tier limits. These are corrections to our representation, not a proven September change to all Topstep terms. Eligibility still depends on personal circumstances.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
TopstepOpen watch

Topstep still gives different minimum-day descriptions

Check the applicable Combine consistency requirement and obtain clarification before planning a one-day pass. The six monthly prices were separately verified; this unresolved rule does not establish a price change or a new account restriction.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
FundingPipsVerified

FundingPips changed the current Flex target and rechecked reward routes

Do not plan against the older 2 Step Flex 6% Phase 2 target or an assumed 85% 1 Step split. At checkout, compare the selected target, reward cycle, minimum-day rule, consistency condition and Master holding add-on for the exact account.

Checked Sep 29, 2026Details
FundingPipsVerified

FundingPips separates the current Standard path from legacy 10% resets

A reset can place an older account into a different product rule set. Confirm the product name and target after any reset.

Checked Sep 29, 2026Details
Sources (6 first-party pages, latest capture Oct 6, 2026)
  • FundingPips — 1 Step Flexcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundingPips — 2 Step Flexcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundingPips — 2 Step Procaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundingPips — 2 Step Standardcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundingPips — FundingPips Zerocaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • Topstep — Trading Combine - No Activation Fee Path, Trading Combine - Standard Pathcaptured Oct 6, 2026

Every figure above is read from these pages. Products older than 30 days are removed from the comparison until they are recaptured, so a missing product means stale data, not a discontinued plan.

Firm-level context

These directory fields describe the firms, not a universal product rule. The sourced product tables above decide the exact fee, split, drawdown and trading conditions. Directory context is not independently refreshed by this comparison; verify platform and payment availability for the exact programme and country.

Spec
FundingPips
Topstep
Founded
2022
2012
Platforms
MT5 · cTrader · Match-Trader
TopstepX
Assets
Forex · Indices · Commodities · Crypto
Futures
Payout Methods
Card · Bank wire · Rise · Crypto
ACH · Bank wire

Trustpilot: FundingPips vs Topstep

Scored out of 5 by Trustpilot users, not by us. Where Trustpilot has pulled a firm's aggregate rating we say so rather than leaving a blank.

FundingPips

TrustpilotChecked 27 Jul 2026

4.5/ 5from 63,734 reviews

Check FundingPips on Trustpilot

Topstep

TrustpilotChecked 27 Jul 2026

3.6/ 5from 14,478 reviews

Check Topstep on Trustpilot
Keep comparing

Compare each firm with close alternatives

These links are selected by asset and platform overlap, then limited to matchups where both sides have current first-party product evidence.

All comparisons
  • More with FundingPips

    FundedNext vs FundingPips

    9 current products · 9 first-party source pages · checked Sep 29, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with FundingPips

    E8 Markets vs FundingPips

    10 current products · 9 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with Topstep

    Topstep vs TradeDay

    5 current products · 2 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with Topstep

    Topstep vs Tradeify

    6 current products · 2 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison

Want to compare a different pair?

Browse pairs with current product sources, or open the full firm directory. Missing comparison evidence does not mean a firm has closed.

All comparisons Full firm directory