Traders Fund Hub
CompareRU
Traders Fund Hub

Compare 18 prop firms on fees, rules and payouts, with a date on every source.

Editorially independent: partnerships never change scores or order.

Latest product capture Oct 14, 2026·80 priced programmes

Compare

  • Best Prop Firms 2026
  • Firm directory
  • Compare challenges
  • Rule changes
  • Cheapest firms
  • Discount codes
  • How challenges work

By country & style

  • UK
  • US
  • India
  • India: challenge comparison
  • India: firm matchups
  • India: rule changes
  • Futures
  • Crypto
  • Swing trading

Reviews

  • FTMO
  • FundedNext
  • FundingPips
  • E8 Markets
  • Alpha Capital
  • All reviews & guides

Company

  • About us
  • How we score firms
  • Authors
  • Contact

Trading involves significant risk of loss. Information only, not financial advice. Some links are affiliate links. Full disclaimers →

© 2026 Traders Fund Hub. All rights reserved.

  • Русская версия
  • Methodology
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimers
All comparisons
Product evidence · 6 products · 5 source pages

FundedNext vs Topstep (2026): 4 vs 2 Products

Compare 6 current products across 5 first-party source pages — funded cost, split, drawdown and payout rules without flattening one product into a firm-wide answer.

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you sign up via eligible links on this page, at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.

FundedNext

TFH 8.8/10
  • Products4 fresh
  • Starting splits70–80%
  • DrawdownsStatic / Trailing
Visit FundedNext Read full review
vs

Topstep

TFH 8.5/10
  • Products2 fresh
  • Starting splits90%
  • DrawdownsEOD trailing
Visit Topstep Read full review

Evidence summary

Available product sources · earliest check Sep 29, 2026

We track 4 FundedNext products and 2 from Topstep that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-06. These firms sell different instruments — FundedNext runs CFD products and Topstep runs futures — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race. FundedNext offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Product-level: FundedNext vs Topstep

Compare the 6 source-checked products available here, each with its own fees, split, drawdown and date.

We track 4 FundedNext products and 2 from Topstep that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-06. These firms sell different instruments — FundedNext runs CFD products and Topstep runs futures — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race.

FundedNext offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

FundedNext's own products disagree on 9 terms. On evaluation steps it is 2-step on Stellar 2-Step and Stellar Lite, versus 1-step on Stellar 1-Step, versus instant funding on Stellar Instant. Which product you buy decides that rule, not which firm you sign with — a firm-level table cannot show this.

Cost to funded, matched by account size

$50K account

FundedNext offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Cost to a funded $50K account, every verified product on both sides
ProductCost to fundedBreak-even profitR-multipleDays @ 1%/day
Trading Combine - No Activation Fee PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$951 month, no activation fee$106at 90% split0.05vs $2,000 tier max loss—
Trading Combine - Standard PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$1981 month + $149 activation$220at 90% split0.11vs $2,000 tier max loss—
Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$230One-time fee$287at 80% split0.07vs 8% max DD1
Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$300One-time fee$375at 80% split0.07vs 10% max DD1
Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$330One-time fee$412at 80% split0.14vs 6% max DD1

R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.

$100K account

FundedNext offers USD one-time; Topstep offers USD monthly at this tier. No currency-and-billing class appears on both sides, so we neither convert currencies nor rank a recurring floor against a fixed total.

Cost to a funded $100K account, every verified product on both sides
ProductCost to fundedBreak-even profitR-multipleDays @ 1%/day
Trading Combine - No Activation Fee PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$1491 month, no activation fee$166at 90% split0.06vs $3,000 tier max loss—
Trading Combine - Standard PathTopstep · Monthly · 90% split$2481 month + $149 activation$276at 90% split0.09vs $3,000 tier max loss—
Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$400One-time fee$500at 80% split0.06vs 8% max DD1
Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$550One-time fee$687at 80% split0.07vs 10% max DD1
Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split$570One-time fee$712at 80% split0.12vs 6% max DD1

R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.

Rule-by-rule, product by product

Each cell shows every value that firm's current products hold. Where a firm disagrees with itself the products are named — those are the rows a firm-level table has to flatten, and the ones that decide whether your strategy is allowed. 9 of 16 rows split this way in this matchup.

Product-level rule comparison, FundedNext vs Topstep
TermFundedNextTopstep
Evaluation steps
2-stepStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite
1-stepStellar 1-Step
Instant fundingStellar Instant
1-step
Profit split
80%Stellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite
70%Stellar Instant
90%
Drawdown method
StaticStellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite
TrailingStellar Instant
EOD trailing
Daily loss cap
3%Stellar 1-Step
4%Stellar Lite
5%Stellar 2-Step
Not publishedStellar Instant
Not published
Max loss cap
6%Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Instant
10%Stellar 2-Step
8%Stellar Lite
Fixed $ per tier
Funded drawdown
StaticStellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite
TrailingStellar Instant
EOD trailing
Min trading days
5Stellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite
0Stellar Instant
2Stellar 1-Step
Unverified
Max trading dayssame
Unverified
Unverified
Consistency rule
Unverified
55%
First payout after
21 daysStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite
0 daysStellar Instant
5 daysStellar 1-Step
Not published
Payout frequency
Bi-weeklyStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite
On demandStellar Instant
WeeklyStellar 1-Step
On demand
News tradingsame
Conditional
Conditional
Weekend holding
Allowed
Not allowed
Overnight holding
Allowed
Not allowed
EAs / algossame
Conditional
Conditional
Copy tradingsame
Conditional
Conditional

Dated changes affecting these firms

TopstepVerified

Topstep now publishes a 55% Combine consistency target

Use 55% for the Combine objective. The separate XFA Consistency payout route remains 40% with three trading days. October 6 is our observation date, not an established effective date; minimum-day descriptions still conflict.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
TopstepVerified

Correction: Topstep payout eligibility is not a three-calendar-day transfer

TFH removed the single calendar-day payout figure, corrected the No Activation Fee path's blanket automation permissions and added the published dollar loss limits per tier. Fee-recovery tables now use those tier limits. These are corrections to our representation, not a proven September change to all Topstep terms. Eligibility still depends on personal circumstances.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
TopstepOpen watch

Topstep still gives different minimum-day descriptions

Check the applicable Combine consistency requirement and obtain clarification before planning a one-day pass. The six monthly prices were separately verified; this unresolved rule does not establish a price change or a new account restriction.

Checked Oct 6, 2026Details
FundedNextVerified

FundedNext Stellar Instant prices now include cents

The comparison now preserves the cents shown by FundedNext. Confirm the final standard or swap-free price and any optional add-on in checkout before paying.

Checked Sep 29, 2026Details
FundedNextVerified

Correction: Stellar 1-Step forex leverage is 1:30, not 1:100

Do not size a Stellar 1-Step position using the 1:100 figure for Stellar 2-Step or Lite. Recheck required margin for the exact programme; leverage does not increase its loss limits. This rule check did not refresh product prices.

Checked Sep 8, 2026Details
FundedNextVerified

FundedNext's EA article limits automation to accounts below $50,000

Buying an EA add-on is not universal permission to automate. Check the exact account size and programme. The article gives no effective date or existing-account exemption; the product price captures have not been refreshed.

Checked Sep 8, 2026Details
FundedNextOpen watch

FundedNext's general and Instant EA articles differ in account-size detail

Confirm how the general size rule applies before automating a scaled Instant account. An omitted limit in one article is not proof of an exception; retain the written answer for the exact programme and account size.

Checked Sep 8, 2026Details
Sources (5 first-party pages, latest capture Oct 6, 2026)
  • FundedNext — Stellar 1-Stepcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundedNext — Stellar 2-Stepcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundedNext — Stellar Instantcaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • FundedNext — Stellar Litecaptured Sep 29, 2026
  • Topstep — Trading Combine - No Activation Fee Path, Trading Combine - Standard Pathcaptured Oct 6, 2026

Every figure above is read from these pages. Products older than 30 days are removed from the comparison until they are recaptured, so a missing product means stale data, not a discontinued plan.

Firm-level context

These directory fields describe the firms, not a universal product rule. The sourced product tables above decide the exact fee, split, drawdown and trading conditions. Directory context is not independently refreshed by this comparison; verify platform and payment availability for the exact programme and country.

Spec
FundedNext
Topstep
Founded
2022
2012
Platforms
MT4 · MT5 · cTrader · Match-Trader
TopstepX
Assets
Forex · Crypto · Indices · Commodities
Futures
Payout Methods
Bank wire · Rise · Crypto
ACH · Bank wire

Trustpilot: FundedNext vs Topstep

Scored out of 5 by Trustpilot users, not by us. Where Trustpilot has pulled a firm's aggregate rating we say so rather than leaving a blank.

FundedNext

TrustpilotChecked 27 Jul 2026

4.5/ 5from 74,352 reviews

Check FundedNext on Trustpilot

Topstep

TrustpilotChecked 27 Jul 2026

3.6/ 5from 14,478 reviews

Check Topstep on Trustpilot
Keep comparing

Compare each firm with close alternatives

These links are selected by asset and platform overlap, then limited to matchups where both sides have current first-party product evidence.

All comparisons
  • More with FundedNext

    FundedNext vs FundingPips

    9 current products · 9 first-party source pages · checked Sep 29, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with FundedNext

    E8 Markets vs FundedNext

    9 current products · 8 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with Topstep

    Topstep vs TradeDay

    5 current products · 2 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison
  • More with Topstep

    Topstep vs Tradeify

    6 current products · 2 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026

    Open comparison

Want to compare a different pair?

Browse pairs with current product sources, or open the full firm directory. Missing comparison evidence does not mean a firm has closed.

All comparisons Full firm directory