Compare 9 current products across 7 first-party source pages — funded cost, split, drawdown and payout rules without flattening one product into a firm-wide answer.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you sign up via eligible links on this page, at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.
Available product sources · earliest check Sep 29, 2026
We track 5 Crypto Fund Trader products and 4 from FundedNext that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-14. These firms sell different instruments — Crypto Fund Trader runs crypto products and FundedNext runs CFD — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race. FundedNext is cheaper to funded at 6 of the 6 directly comparable tiers. At $5K, the cheapest verified route is Stellar Lite at $33 (One-time fee), which needs $41 of profit at a 80% split before the fee is back in your pocket.
Compare the 9 source-checked products available here, each with its own fees, split, drawdown and date.
We track 5 Crypto Fund Trader products and 4 from FundedNext that pass the 30-day source-freshness gate; source checks range from 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-14. These firms sell different instruments — Crypto Fund Trader runs crypto products and FundedNext runs CFD — so treat the tables below as a fit comparison, not a like-for-like price race.
FundedNext is cheaper to funded at 6 of the 6 directly comparable tiers. At $5K, the cheapest verified route is Stellar Lite at $33 (One-time fee), which needs $41 of profit at a 80% split before the fee is back in your pocket.
Crypto Fund Trader's own products disagree on 13 terms. On evaluation steps it is 1-step on Accelerated (1-Phase) and Break Challenge, versus 2-step on Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase) and Ascend Evaluation, versus instant funding on Instant. Which product you buy decides that rule, not which firm you sign with — a firm-level table cannot show this.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $33 — $7 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Accelerated (1-Phase), $40) — 18% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $33One-time fee | $41at 80% split | 0.10vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $40One-time fee | $50at 80% split | 0.17vs 6% trailing max DD | 1 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $58One-time fee | $73at 80% split | 0.14vs 10% max DD | 2 |
| Stellar InstantFundedNext · One-time · 70% split | $150One-time fee | $214at 70% split | 0.71vs 6% trailing max DD | — |
| InstantCrypto Fund Trader · One-time · 50% split | $240One-time fee | $480at 50% split | 1.60vs 6% max DD | 10 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $60 — $20 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Accelerated (1-Phase), $80) — 25% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $60One-time fee | $75at 80% split | 0.09vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $80One-time fee | $100at 80% split | 0.17vs 6% trailing max DD | 1 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $110One-time fee | $138at 80% split | 0.14vs 10% max DD | 2 |
| Stellar InstantFundedNext · One-time · 70% split | $300One-time fee | $429at 70% split | 0.71vs 6% trailing max DD | — |
| InstantCrypto Fund Trader · One-time · 50% split | $475One-time fee | $950at 50% split | 1.58vs 6% max DD | 10 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $140 — $68 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Break Challenge, $208) — 33% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $140One-time fee | $175at 80% split | 0.09vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $200One-time fee | $250at 80% split | 0.10vs 10% max DD | 1 |
| Break ChallengeCrypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $208Fee + tier activation | $260at 80% split | 0.26vs $1,000 tier max loss | — |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $219One-time fee | $274at 80% split | 0.18vs 6% trailing max DD | 2 |
| Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $220One-time fee | $275at 80% split | 0.18vs 6% max DD | 2 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $240One-time fee | $300at 80% split | 0.12vs 10% max DD | 2 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $230 — $108 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Break Challenge, $338) — 32% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $230One-time fee | $287at 80% split | 0.07vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $300One-time fee | $375at 80% split | 0.07vs 10% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $330One-time fee | $412at 80% split | 0.14vs 6% max DD | 1 |
| Break ChallengeCrypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $338Fee + tier activation | $423at 80% split | 0.21vs $2,000 tier max loss | — |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $369One-time fee | $461at 80% split | 0.15vs 6% trailing max DD | 1 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $389One-time fee | $486at 80% split | 0.10vs 10% max DD | 1 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $400 — $128 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Break Challenge, $528) — 24% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $400One-time fee | $500at 80% split | 0.06vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Break ChallengeCrypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $528Fee + tier activation | $660at 80% split | 0.22vs $3,000 tier max loss | — |
| Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $550One-time fee | $687at 80% split | 0.07vs 10% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $570One-time fee | $712at 80% split | 0.12vs 6% max DD | 1 |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $619One-time fee | $774at 80% split | 0.13vs 6% trailing max DD | 1 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $660One-time fee | $825at 80% split | 0.08vs 10% max DD | 1 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
FundedNext is cheaper within the shared USD one-time class: Stellar Lite at $799 — $400 less than Crypto Fund Trader's cheapest route at this tier (Accelerated (1-Phase), $1,199) — 33% cheaper.
| Product | Cost to funded | Break-even profit | R-multiple | Days @ 1%/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar LiteFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $799One-time fee | $999at 80% split | 0.06vs 8% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 2-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $1,100One-time fee | $1,375at 80% split | 0.07vs 10% max DD | 1 |
| Stellar 1-StepFundedNext · One-time · 80% split | $1,100One-time fee | $1,375at 80% split | 0.11vs 6% max DD | 1 |
| Accelerated (1-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $1,199One-time fee | $1,499at 80% split | 0.12vs 6% trailing max DD | 1 |
| Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase)Crypto Fund Trader · One-time · 80% split | $1,250One-time fee | $1,563at 80% split | 0.08vs 10% max DD | 1 |
R-multiple is break-even profit divided by that product's own maximum permitted loss — under 1.00 means you can lose more than you need to make to win the fee back. Day count assumes 1% account growth per day, capped by the product's own daily loss limit. Blank cells are figures the firm does not publish.
Each cell shows every value that firm's current products hold. Where a firm disagrees with itself the products are named — those are the rows a firm-level table has to flatten, and the ones that decide whether your strategy is allowed. 13 of 16 rows split this way in this matchup.
| Term | Crypto Fund Trader | FundedNext |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation steps | 1-stepAccelerated (1-Phase), Break Challenge 2-stepEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation Instant fundingInstant | 2-stepStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite 1-stepStellar 1-Step Instant fundingStellar Instant |
| Profit split | 80%Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Accelerated (1-Phase), Break Challenge 50%Instant Not publishedAscend Evaluation | 80%Stellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite 70%Stellar Instant |
| Drawdown method | StaticEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation TrailingAccelerated (1-Phase), Break Challenge Not publishedInstant | StaticStellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite TrailingStellar Instant |
| Daily loss cap | 4%Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant 5%Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation Not publishedBreak Challenge | 3%Stellar 1-Step 4%Stellar Lite 5%Stellar 2-Step Not publishedStellar Instant |
| Max loss cap | 10%Evaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation 6%Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant Fixed $ per tierBreak Challenge | 6%Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Instant 10%Stellar 2-Step 8%Stellar Lite |
| Funded drawdown | StaticEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation TrailingAccelerated (1-Phase), Break Challenge Not publishedInstant | StaticStellar 2-Step, Stellar 1-Step, Stellar Lite TrailingStellar Instant |
| Min trading days | 0 | 5Stellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite 0Stellar Instant 2Stellar 1-Step |
| Max trading days | UnlimitedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant UnverifiedAscend Evaluation, Break Challenge | Unverified |
| Consistency rule | UnverifiedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation, Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant 40%Break Challenge | Unverified |
| First payout after | Not publishedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation, Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant 0 daysBreak Challenge | 21 daysStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite 0 daysStellar Instant 5 daysStellar 1-Step |
| Payout frequency | Not publishedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Ascend Evaluation, Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant On demandBreak Challenge | Bi-weeklyStellar 2-Step, Stellar Lite On demandStellar Instant WeeklyStellar 1-Step |
| News trading | AllowedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant, Break Challenge ConditionalAscend Evaluation | Conditional |
| Weekend holdingsame | Allowed | Allowed |
| Overnight holdingsame | Allowed | Allowed |
| EAs / algossame | Conditional | Conditional |
| Copy trading | Not publishedEvaluation (Standard 2-Phase), Accelerated (1-Phase), Instant ConditionalBreak Challenge Not allowedAscend Evaluation | Conditional |
CFT homepage prices still differ from Ascend and Break terms
Confirm the exact product, account size, availability and final checkout fee before purchase. Break activation remains a separate charge. This conflict check leaves product capture dates unchanged and does not establish a verified price change.
FundedNext Stellar Instant prices now include cents
The comparison now preserves the cents shown by FundedNext. Confirm the final standard or swap-free price and any optional add-on in checkout before paying.
CFT Ascend and Break fee ladders were resolved from current terms
CFT's Ascend and Break tiers can now appear in fresh price comparisons, but Ascend pays fixed scholarships rather than an ongoing percentage split and Break requires activation after review. Verify the selected tier and final checkout availability, especially where a page block still says sold out.
Correction: CFT reward shares and payout timing depend on the programme
This corrects TFH's blanket 80% and bi-weekly descriptions, not a proven September policy change. The regenerated Instant fee-recovery model uses the 50% starting share. Numeric payout timing is left unverified where the calendar field cannot express the conditions; no actual customer payout was independently verified.
Correction: Stellar 1-Step forex leverage is 1:30, not 1:100
Do not size a Stellar 1-Step position using the 1:100 figure for Stellar 2-Step or Lite. Recheck required margin for the exact programme; leverage does not increase its loss limits. This rule check did not refresh product prices.
FundedNext's EA article limits automation to accounts below $50,000
Buying an EA add-on is not universal permission to automate. Check the exact account size and programme. The article gives no effective date or existing-account exemption; the product price captures have not been refreshed.
FundedNext's general and Instant EA articles differ in account-size detail
Confirm how the general size rule applies before automating a scaled Instant account. An omitted limit in one article is not proof of an exception; retain the written answer for the exact programme and account size.
Every figure above is read from these pages. Products older than 30 days are removed from the comparison until they are recaptured, so a missing product means stale data, not a discontinued plan.
These directory fields describe the firms, not a universal product rule. The sourced product tables above decide the exact fee, split, drawdown and trading conditions. Directory context is not independently refreshed by this comparison; verify platform and payment availability for the exact programme and country.
Scored out of 5 by Trustpilot users, not by us. Where Trustpilot has pulled a firm's aggregate rating we say so rather than leaving a blank.
Rating suppressed by Trustpilot
Trustpilot's notice on this profile reads: “This company's rating is unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines.” The profile still carries 1,140 reviews.
Check Crypto Fund Trader on TrustpilotThese links are selected by asset and platform overlap, then limited to matchups where both sides have current first-party product evidence.
10 current products · 8 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026
Open comparison10 current products · 7 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026
Open comparison9 current products · 9 first-party source pages · checked Sep 29, 2026
Open comparison9 current products · 8 first-party source pages · checked Oct 14, 2026
Open comparisonBrowse pairs with current product sources, or open the full firm directory. Missing comparison evidence does not mean a firm has closed.
