A side-by-side breakdown of FTMO and FundedNext — profit splits, payout speed, drawdown rules, platforms, and a clear verdict on which firm wins for which trader profile.
Disclosure: We earn a commission if you sign up via links on this page — at no cost to you. Our reviews are independent and not influenced by partners. Learn more.
Editorial verdict · Updated May 2026
FTMO is the choice when payout reliability and a decade-long track record matter more than headline percentages — its 90% split is paid bi-weekly with a payout history that has survived multiple industry shakeouts. FundedNext wins on the numbers: a 95% split, on-demand payouts, and a $4M scaling ceiling that doubles FTMO’s. Pick FundedNext if you want flexibility and faster cash; pick FTMO if you want the lowest probability of a payout dispute.
Winning value on each row is marked. Ties are flagged. Empty cells mean we don't have that data point yet.
Pick FTMO if you trade cTrader or DXTrade, want exposure to individual stocks alongside Forex, or simply care more about a multi-year payout track record than a 5-point split difference. UK and EU traders looking for the lowest-friction safe default still default to FTMO for a reason — the firm has weathered multiple industry cleanups without disrupting funded traders.
Pick FundedNext if you want a higher headline split, on-demand withdrawals, and a path to a $4M allocation. Its Stellar 1-step model is also more forgiving on profit targets than the FTMO two-step Challenge, so it’s the better pick for traders who’ve washed out of an FTMO verification phase. The trade-off is a shorter track record and a narrower platform list.
Every firm pair has a page. Browse the hub or open the full directory.